Weber Bureaucracy Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Questions: 1.Bureaucracy was conceived by Weber as a blueprint for efficiency which would emphasise rules rather than people, and competence rather than favouritism. Based on your readings and other references, do you believe Webers assumptions hold true in today's contemporary organisations? 2.Under scientific management, dividing labour evenly between workers and managers is essentially said to promote a sense of cooperation between workers and management. Based on your readings and other references, do you agree with this statement? Answers: 1. In the current scenario, charismatic form of authority is generally effective and applicable in the rapidly changing environment. Weber bureaucracy theory prioritizes efficiency, which is not necessary the most efficient and best practice to implement. Recently the leaders mostly believe in transformational approach. Weber has been able to observe three major types of power within the organization. This includes charismatic, traditional and bureaucratic or rational-legal (Fantuzzo 2015). Major emphasis is given on the bureaucratic power of the organization. Webersmanagement theory mostly stresses on strict rules and power distribution is very firm. The leaders in todays times are open to new and innovative ideas and uses flexible work arrangements for effective management. Many of the beliefs of Weber often discourage collaboration and creativity in the workplace. Bureaucracy in the recent times is an administrative system that is generated to fulfill the large-scale administrative tasks by coordinating the works of the individuals systematically (Spicer 2015). The bureaucracy theory of Weber opposes risk and flexibility. According to Weber, responsibilities should be delegated to individuals only based on ability and skill. Creative thinking, collaboration and idea pitching are highly discouraged. Rigid compliances with the regulations and policies in the recent times often discourage creativity and initiative. It is difficult for the individuals to work in such environment that does not offer them any flexibility. This further gives rise to inefficiency and dissatisfaction among the individuals towards their work and organization as well. Finally, bureaucracy also generates room for abuse of position and power by the top-level individuals who control the system. 2. Yes, dividing the workers l evenly between managers and workers is important to promote cooperation between the managers and the workers. Increases the workers productivity as training time is reduced and in a very short period of time the workers gets productive (Tapia, Ibsen and Kochan 2015). All concentration of the worker is given in the specified task, which makes the worker productive for a short period of time. Overall time that was previously used is reduced as only little amount of time is spent while moving between the task. One of the greatest advantages related to division of labors between workers and mangers helps in increasing the productivity rate of workers. Enhance quality of the product also brings enough gains to the consumer. Individuals present in the organization have vast amount of abilities and skills. Dividing the labors according to their competence and skills also increases their efficiency level High degree of efficiency is ensured as the right individ ual is put in the right job. Moreover, the workers acquire higher dexterity and become highly skilled as repeated performance for the same operational activities is carried continuously. Major important advantage is that it helps in the promotion and development of better techniques and new ideas for doing the work (Beaudry, Green and Sand 2016).Dividing the labor among managers and workers leads to teach him only that amount of work that is required to perform. This saves long period of unnecessary training and also extra money and time is saved. Therefore, it is relevant to divide the labors as mechanism becomes easier. Furthermore, efficiency of organizational production is enhanced. References: Beaudry, P., Green, D.A. and Sand, B.M., 2016. The great reversal in the demand for skill and cognitive tasks.Journal of Labor Economics,34(S1), pp.S199-S247. Fantuzzo, J., 2015. A Course between Bureaucracy and Charisma: A Pedagogical Reading of Max Weber's Social Theory.Journal of Philosophy of Education,49(1), pp.45-64. Spicer, M.W., 2015. Public administration in a disenchanted world: Reflections on Max Webers value pluralism and his views on politics and bureaucracy.Administration Society,47(1), pp.24-43. Tapia, M., Ibsen, C.L. and Kochan, T.A., 2015. Mapping the frontier of theory in industrial relations: the contested role of worker representation.Socio-Economic Review,13(1), pp.157-184.